Search for a command to run...
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Ennes Goldstein
Ennes Goldstein
Ennes Goldstein (Part 1)
Ennes Goldstein
The numbers are stark, the implications profound. Across the globe, from the developed world to the high-income enclaves of developing nations, humanity is not reproducing itself. The necessary replacement level for a stable population is births per woman. Yet, nation after nation is sinking far below this threshold. This isn't just a concern for demographers; it's an existential question.
If the world were to adopt the fertility rate of the highest Scandinavian country (Norway)—a place with extensive social safety nets and family support, currently below —and pair it with a magically increased average human lifespan of 90 years, the global population by the year 3025 would stand at a staggering low of only 30 million people. On Earth.
This thought experiment dramatically illustrates that incremental policy changes are merely slowing a collapse, not averting it.
The crisis isn't simply that many countries are below ; it's that no country has successfully recovered to a replacement level once their fertility rate dropped significantly.
The shift away from procreation is a cocktail of socioeconomic forces:
During the agricultural era and in rural settings, a child was an economic asset, contributing to labour in non-organised sectors from an early age. In the modern, urban, complex economy, this dynamic has completely reversed. Children are a long-term liability in terms of time, finance, and parental focus, offering little practical utility to the parent for the first two decades, or perhaps ever. The complex requirements of modern organisations effectively block meaningful work for young children.
Modern society demands that women compete for status in the workforce on equal footing with men. This is difficult enough, but women must also navigate the biological reality of taking time off to bear and raise children, which significantly impacts their competitive standing and career trajectory.
While economic factors like the cost of living, housing supply, and inadequate government assistance for childcare are significant contributors, they do not appear to be the root cause. Even among the higher-income populations in developed countries—the group best positioned to financially afford children—the fertility rate is still around . Even the vaunted social safety nets of Scandinavia, which offer extensive support, fail to push the rate past . This suggests that better healthcare, income, and housing are insufficient solutions.
Fertility rates of different quantiles of the population in the Netherlands (2008-2022)
If money, support, and longevity (even in a hypothetical post-scarcity society powered by AI) won't solve the fertility crisis, what will?
The core issue may be one of status and social valuation. In a society that primarily assigns status based on professional achievement and career success, the demanding, non-pecuniary work of motherhood has been devalued.
The proposed solution—and perhaps the only pathway back from the demographic cliff—is a fundamental re-alignment of social values:
We must restore and correctly align status to reflect the immense and crucial value of femininity and motherhood.
If we can shift the cultural narrative so that women pursue careers out of choice rather than necessity, and if society truly elevates the role of the primary caregiver, we might then see a cultural and demographic shift. Without this change in social status, humanity's current trajectory points toward a long, slow, and possibly inevitable extinction, regardless of our technological advances. The clock is ticking, not on resource depletion, but on the simple choice to continue our species.